Research Ethics Guidelines
1. Research Involving Human Subject
When reporting on research that involves human subjects, human material, human tissues or human data, authors must declare that the investigations were carried out following the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975 (http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/), revised in 2008. A written informed consent for publication must be obtained from participating patients in this case. Editors reserve the rights to reject any submission that does not meet these requirements.
Example of Ethical Statements: All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of XXX (Project identification code).
2. Potential Conflicts of Interest
It is the authors' responsibility to identify and declare any personal circumstances or interests that may be perceived as inappropriately influencing their research. If there is no conflict, please state "The authors declare no conflict of interest". This should be conveyed in a separate "Conflicts of Interest" section preceding the "References" sections at the end of the manuscript. 
3. Funding: 
Financial support for the study must be fully disclosed in the "Acknowledgments" section.
4. Suggesting Reviewers
During the submission process, authors are pre encouraged to list three names of potential reviewers with the appropriate expertise to review the manuscript. The editors will not necessarily approach these referees. Please provide detailed contact information (address, homepage, phone, e-mail address). Proposed reviewers should be from different institutions to the authors. You may identify appropriate Editorial Board members of the journal as potential reviewers. You may also suggest reviewers from among the authors that you frequently cite in your paper.
5. Publication Ethics Statement
The editors of this journal take the responsibility to enforce a rigorous peer-review process together with strict ethical policies and standards to ensure to add high quality scientific works to the field of scholarly publication. Unfortunately, cases of plagiarism, data falsification, image manipulation, inappropriate authorship credit, and the like, do arise. 
6. The plagiarism 
The journal believes that taking the ideas and work of others without giving them credit is unfair and dishonest. Copying even one sentence from someone else's manuscript, or even one of your own that has previously been published, without proper citation is considered plagiarism, use your own words instead. The EBSS use software ITHENTICATE to detect plagiarism in submitted articles. The editorial board retains the absolute authority to reject the review process of a submitted manuscript if it subject to minor or major plagiarism and even may cancel the publication upon the complaint of victim(s) of plagiarism.